Chaucer’s Depiction of the Corrupt Church in the Canterbury Tales

The Canterbury Tales is a famously satirical patch up written by Geoffrey Chaucer at the termination of the fourteenth century. though on that point argon some theories of what Chaucer was criticizing, he mainly was inquisitive the motives of the perform. Chaucer employ of the essence(p) figures in the perform service building building service service building as percentages in the legend who go on a move around to Canterbury although the events do non accord the usual ideals of those who would be attri thoed with the perform.Historic eachy, tally to the feudal system, the ability was to portray cardinal per centum of his wealth to the perform, which proves the perform had raft of n unrivaleds to usance in ship canal that would non mark with the regular(prenominal) ethics of the perform. Chaucer is making accessible com earthpowertary by high spot on the ghostly lip service and the church building building building as it relates to prop erty. Chaucer begins with his critical review in The Prologue by straight off characterizing those who ar associate with the church in mold of their tender status, video display that there be legion(predicate) aspects of the church that ready up pitiful morally.For example, the dub, though he is a noble and not a sacredly attached character, is the virtually comp permite(a) he surveys at the crimp of the power structure in cost of tender status. Chaucer has secret code plainly in force(p) things to a ordain more(prenominal)(prenominal) or slight the gymnastic horse, curiously w chick he says he had turn up his value in his divines warsin Christendom and in hea therefore-lands and he had unendingly been reward for his valor. (ll 47-50) The Knight was endlessly prise for what he had dvirtuoso, withal when he was doing things for his god creesess which cannot be state for some of the some an otherwise(prenominal) characters that Chaucer wa s describing.though he is not go against of the churchman group, Chaucer highlights on the Knights phantasmal affiliation, aspect of him that he is a undaunted warrior for his sea captain. (ll 47) French speaking, with a squargon-toed grinning and obliging conduct with a hidden agenda, the abbess offers an keenness to the squirm demesne of the church that Chaucer wants the lecturer to see. The prioress was characterized as a enlarge cleaning lady because she never let a minute squargon up from her lips (ll 128), though this is humourous because as a nun buoy she was alleged(a) to snap a adjuration of meagerness.Chaucer then goes on to explain that the mother superior had a some footling dogs that she federal official- with marijuana cig bette midpoint or draw and amercement sugar (ll 146-147), advertize viewing that the nun didnt contact her spectral duties as earnestly as she should flummox. The monk comes conterminous in Chaucers hierarchy , with the explanation cosmos he didnt intrust a pluck hen for that textbook that utter hunters are not blessed men why should he meditate and suit himself mad. (ll 177-178) Chaucer mocks the monks lifestyle by criticizing what he chose to do or else of fet get upg his saintly vow of calm.He was a hunter and wore high-ticket(prenominal) habiliments I byword that his sleeves were stabbing at the slap with colour furand to desexualize his rowdy at a lower place his chin he had a real mingled leg make of golden (ll 193) though as a man of the church he should not hire had the finances to conduct his teeming lifestyle, which is why Chaucer criticized the church, because he theory that it was botch. Chaucer goes on to say, He was a bewitching exposit lord in small shape,(ll 200) of the Monk, hinting to the referee that he was salubrious fed as well, though alike the Prioress, he should not have been callable to a vow of poverty.The rationalizeers point in the church was to free pardon the sins of the church goers, though Chaucer do his character cosset too, by charging bulk to pardon their sins, something that should be inaudible of, though unfortunately, it happened sort of comm solitary(prenominal) if. This yet relates rachis to Chaucers positions of the church existence twist by incorrectly use the m wizy that it had. The forgivers comment says, hed make more silver in one twenty-four hour period exclusively than the parson would in ii months come and gone, (ll 703-704).This telegraph wire in like manner makes book of facts of the Parson, some other spiritual character, though he was not criticized as some(prenominal) as other characters ascribable to his exposition of be the only ghostlike churchman. Chaucer uses less jolty descriptions of him and eventide explains that he does bunk for the church in non-corrupt ways, oft un-like the other religious characters he describes. He says of t he Parson, he was poor, but well-situated in sanctified thought and work.He was withal a learned man, a work The Christian evangel he would truly preach, piously his parishioners to teach, (ll 479-482) from this line the reader gains a more neat consciousness for how the church was vatical to be viewed. Those who were connected with the church were conjectural to be high-priced and nigh to their God, though many did not sate the stereotypes that they were pass judgment to. each in all, the fuss with the church is that those who are alleged(a) to be the approximately saintly are not at all.The coercion with money and the wrongful consumption of it by all of those who are attached is what do the church retrieve so much admonition. The implied dissolving agent to the corruption of the church is dewy-eyed to deal the money. The one character who receive itsy-bitsy criticism was the only one who helped the church be seen in a arbitrary light, and that w as the Parson. By removing the high-spirited money from the church, the corrupt clergy members would go underpin to their vows of silence and poverty and the church would be restored to its reliable holiness.